AUTHOR=Caruso Riccardo , Vicente Emilio , Quijano Yolanda , Zarate Gomez Jorge , Porrero Guerrero Belen , Valdés de Anca Álvaro , Alonso Garcia Maria Teresa , Morales Taboada Álvaro , Pastor Riquelme Pablo , Salido Fernandez Sergio , Serrano Gonzalez Javier , Morante Perea Ana Pilar , Ferri Valentina TITLE=InguinoScrotal Hernias: Comparison of Minimally Invasive Approaches and Open Surgical Repair (The SCAR Study) JOURNAL=Journal of Abdominal Wall Surgery VOLUME=Volume 5 - 2026 YEAR=2026 URL=https://www.frontierspartnerships.org/journals/journal-of-abdominal-wall-surgery/articles/10.3389/jaws.2026.15830 DOI=10.3389/jaws.2026.15830 ISSN=2813-2092 ABSTRACT=IntroductionInguinal hernia repair is one of the most common surgical procedures performed worldwide. Minimally invasive approaches (laparoscopic and robotic) are increasingly recommended owing to their favorable postoperative outcomes. However, their use in inguinoscrotal hernias remains limited. This study aims to evaluate and compare clinical outcomes of minimally invasive and open approaches in inguinoscrotal hernia repair.Methods and analysisThis national multicenter prospective observational cohort study will include patients undergoing elective or urgent repair of European Hernia Society-classified inguinoscrotal hernias (S1–S3) using open, laparoscopic, or robotic techniques. Adults (>18 years) from various hospitals in Madrid will be recruited. Data on patient demographics, intraoperative variables, postoperative complications, postoperative pain (Visual Analog Scale score), quality of life, and hernia recurrence over a 2-year follow-up will be collected. A minimum of 100 patients (50 per group) is required for detecting statistically significant differences, assuming 5% loss to follow-up.Ethics and disseminationThe HM Hospitales Ethics Committee has approved the study protocol. Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants. Results will be submitted to peer-reviewed journals and presented at national surgical conferences.